{"id":4970,"date":"2017-01-15T17:51:41","date_gmt":"2017-01-15T22:51:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/?p=4970"},"modified":"2017-01-15T17:51:41","modified_gmt":"2017-01-15T22:51:41","slug":"whats-the-hurry-to-destroy-obamacare","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/whats-the-hurry-to-destroy-obamacare\/","title":{"rendered":"What&#8217;s the Hurry to Destroy Obamacare?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s worth reading through this short piece from the LA Times&#8217; Michael Hiltzik reviewing and shedding light on some of the many falsehoods the GOP is using to justify its enthusiasm for taking health care away from 20 million Americans by destroying Obamacare.<\/p>\n<p>What&#8217;s the rush?<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h2><a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/hiltzik\/la-fi-hiltzik-obamacare-ryan-townhall-20170113-story.html\">Here are the lies Paul Ryan told about Obamacare during his town hall meeting<\/a><\/h2>\n<div id=\"attachment_4976\" style=\"width: 760px\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" data-attachment-id=\"4976\" data-permalink=\"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/whats-the-hurry-to-destroy-obamacare\/mhiltzik-snap-photo\/\" data-orig-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?fit=750%2C422&amp;ssl=1\" data-orig-size=\"750,422\" data-comments-opened=\"1\" data-image-meta=\"{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}\" data-image-title=\"mhiltzik-snap-photo\" data-image-description=\"\" data-image-caption=\"\" data-large-file=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?fit=750%2C422&amp;ssl=1\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-4976\" class=\"wp-image-4976 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?resize=750%2C422\" width=\"750\" height=\"422\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?w=750&amp;ssl=1 750w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?resize=300%2C169&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 750px) 100vw, 750px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-4976\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">House Speaker Paul Ryan, dancing as fast as he can during Thursday&#8217;s town hall to explain why he&#8217;s in such a hurry to repeal the Affordable Care Act. (CNN)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>We know that House Speaker <a id=\"PEPLT005726\" title=\"Paul Ryan\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/topic\/politics-government\/government\/paul-ryan-PEPLT005726-topic.html\">Paul D. Ryan<\/a> (R-Wisc.) is desperate to repeal the <a id=\"EVGAP00039\" title=\"Affordable Care Act\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/topic\/health\/healthcare\/healthcare-policies-laws\/affordable-care-act-EVGAP00039-topic.html\">Affordable Care Act<\/a>. What he never has been able to explain adequately is why.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Oh, sure, Ryan has offered some rhetorical explanations. He says Obamacare is \u201ccollapsing.\u201d That it\u2019s in a \u201cdeath spiral.\u201d That it\u2019s a \u201cstruggle\u201d for Americans. He says a \u201cmuch, much better system\u201d could be put in its place.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ryan made all these points, and more, during <a href=\"http:\/\/transcripts.cnn.com\/TRANSCRIPTS\/1701\/12\/se.01.html\" target=\"_blank\">a town hall meeting<\/a> Thursday evening aired by CNN. The hour-long session didn\u2019t yield an explanation for Ryan\u2019s haste to take action that could upend insurance coverage for more than 20 million Americans. It did underscore, however, that his description of and position on the law are based on misconceptions, misrepresentations and lies.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Doubts about the wisdom of rushing into repeal \u2014 expressed not only by doctors, hospitals, health advocates, patients and even Republican governors \u2014 haven\u2019t slowed the rush on Capitol Hill. On Friday, the House approved a budget resolution that will begin the process of stripping away some ACA provisions; the Senate passed its own version earlier this week. Nine <a id=\"ORGOV0000004\" title=\"Republican Party\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/topic\/politics-government\/republican-party-ORGOV0000004-topic.html\">Republicans<\/a> crossed the aisle to oppose the measure, which otherwise passed on a party-line vote.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Here are some of the most glaring misstatements about the Affordable Care Act that came out of Ryan\u2019s mouth during the Thursday town hall.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; <strong>\u201cThe law is collapsing.\u201d \u201c<\/strong>We\u2019ve got to rescue people from the collapsing of this law,\u201d Ryan said. He didn\u2019t\u00a0specify what he means by \u201ccollapsing,\u201d but by almost any measure of enrollment and cost this generalization has no basis in truth. Enrollment in private plans offered through the ACA exchanges for 2017 is running well ahead of the figure for 2016. Last year about 11 million people signed up for exchange plans; this year the total is <a href=\"http:\/\/acasignups.net\/sites\/default\/files\/pictures\/2017_graph122116.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">projected to be 12 million<\/a>. That\u2019s not counting enrollees under Medicaid expansion, who number about 11 million.<\/p>\n<div class=\"trb_embed_related\" data-role=\"lightbox_metadata\">\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/-Ph0pT5Myy8\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<div class=\"trb_embed_related_credit_and_caption\">Arizona Republican Jeff Jeans confronts Ryan about Obamacare replacement during Thursday&#8217;s town hall.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<strong>Premium increases. <\/strong>Ryan maintains that premium increases for ACA plans are unsupportable for American families. He expounded on this issue in response to a question from Jeff Jeans, a member of the town hall audience. (See accompanying video.) Jeans described himself as a small business owner and Republican who had been dead set against Obamacare \u2014 until he was diagnosed with cancer at age 49.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThanks to the Affordable Care Act, I\u2019m standing here today alive,\u201d he said. \u201cI want to thank President Obama from the bottom of my heart, because I would be dead if not for him.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"trb_ar_page\" data-role=\"pagination_page\" data-content-page=\"1\" data-state=\"pagination_viewed\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>But when Jeans mentioned that he lived in Arizona, Ryan thought he had a \u201cgotcha.\u201d Pulling a note card\u00a0from his pocket, he reeled off the premium increases for Arizona and a few other states for 2017. \u201cArizona \u2014 this year, the premium increases for people on Obamacare, 116%,\u201d he said. Oklahoma, Tennessee and Minnesota also had double-digit premium increases.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>A few points need to be made here. First, premiums and deductibles were rising before the ACA, and in many cases, the post-ACA increases are lower than before. Moreover, the four states Ryan mentioned were those with the highest increases in benchmark silver plans \u2014 the figures Ryan was using &#8212;\u00a0for 2017. What he didn\u2019t mention was that increases in many other states were <a href=\"https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3288698\/State-Increases.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">much lower<\/a>. Arkansas, Ohio and New Hampshire \u2014 2%. In Massachusetts and Indiana, rates actually dropped.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One reason Arizona rates rose so much is that premiums in that state had been inordinately low; insurers were making up in 2017 for lost ground. In 2016, the average benchmark plan premium for\u00a0a 40-year-old in Phoenix, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.healthinsurance.org\/arizona-state-health-insurance-exchange\/\" target=\"_blank\">according to healthinsurance.org<\/a>, had been $207 per month, one of the lowest rates in the nation, bested only by\u00a0New Mexico and Indiana. The 2017 increase will raise Arizona\u2019s rates to among the nation\u2019s highest, but the increase over the average is nowhere near what Ryan cited.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Most important, the premium increases don\u2019t remotely reflect what most Arizona ACA enrollees \u2014 or those of the other states \u2014 will actually pay. That\u2019s because ACA subsidies are designed to rise in tandem with premiums, or in some cases even faster. In Arizona, 76% of enrollees get a premium subsidy, and more than half also get a subsidy to help pay deductibles and co-pays. State-by-state statistics on <a href=\"https:\/\/assets.documentcloud.org\/documents\/3288698\/State-Increases.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">subsidy increases for 2017 are here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<aside class=\"trb_embed\" data-content-id=\"92329691\" data-content-size=\"large\" data-content-type=\"image\" data-content-slug=\"la-mhiltzik-1484335388-snap-photo\" data-content-subtype=\"photo\" data-role=\"sc_item imgsize_ratiosizecontainer lightbox_container \" data-state=\"\" data-embed-id=\"92329691\">\n<div class=\"trb_embed_modalBox\">\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"trb_embed_media\">\n<figure class=\"trb_embed_imageContainer_figure\" data-role=\"imgsize_item\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"trb_embed_imageContainer_img\" title=\"In almost every state, Obamacare premium increases were more than matched by increases in the government subsidy, as is shown by this chart by Kevin Drum of Mother Jones.\" src=\"http:\/\/www.trbimg.com\/img-587928e5\/turbine\/la-mhiltzik-1484335388-snap-photo\/750\/750x422\" alt=\"In almost every state, Obamacare premium increases were more than matched by increases in the government subsidy, as is shown by this chart by Kevin Drum of Mother Jones.\" data-baseurl=\"http:\/\/www.trbimg.com\/img-587928e5\/turbine\/la-mhiltzik-1484335388-snap-photo\" data-c-nd=\"1600x900\" data-ratio=\"16x9\" data-width=\"750\" data-height=\"400\" \/><\/figure>\n<div class=\"trb_embed_related\" data-role=\"lightbox_metadata\">\n<div class=\"trb_embed_related_credit_and_caption\">In almost every state, Obamacare premium increases were more than matched by increases in the government subsidy, as is shown by this chart by Kevin Drum of Mother Jones. (Motherjones.com)<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p>In Arizona, the subsidies for 2017 are rising 428% for a 27-year-old earning $25,000 and 270% for a family of four with a $60,000 income. For that family, the list price of insurance will average $1,529 a month, but the subsidy will slash that to $405, or $100 per person.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Ryan didn\u2019t mention any of that.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<strong>High-risk pools for preexisting conditions. <\/strong>Ryan understands that protection for people with preexisting medical histories is the most popular element of the Affordable Care Act. Republicans eviscerate it at their peril. He told the town hall audience that the GOP has \u201ca better way\u201d to guarantee coverage for those people: high-risk pools. Separating those with expensive conditions from the overall insurance pool will make insurance cheaper for everyone else, he asserted. Since \u201c8% of all the people under 65 have that kind of preexisting condition,\u201d sequestering them would \u201cdramatically lower the price for the other 92%.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe had a really good one in Wisconsin,\u201d Ryan said. \u201cUtah had a great one. I was talking with a congresswoman from Washington today who was telling me how good their state high-risk pool is.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"trb_ar_page\" data-role=\"pagination_page\" data-content-page=\"2\">A lot of misconceptions and untruths are packed into this spiel. It\u2019s unclear where Ryan got his figure of 8% of Americans suffering from conditions that would relegate them to a high-risk pool, but it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/hiltzik\/la-fi-hiltzik-high-risk-pools-20160428-snap-htmlstory.html\" target=\"_blank\">grossly underestimates the problem<\/a>. The Department\u00a0of Health and Human Services estimated in 2011 that\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/aspe.hhs.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/pdf\/76376\/index.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">50 million to 129 million Americans under 65<\/a>, or 19% to\u00a050%,\u00a0had some kind of preexisting condition and up to 20% of them were uninsured. The ratio rose sharply with age, so that as many as 86% of those aged 55 to\u00a064 were at risk of being denied insurance because of their medical condition. In 2012, FamiliesUSA estimated that\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/familiesusa.org\/blog\/2014\/03\/demographics-people-pre-existing-health-condition\" target=\"_blank\">nearly 25% of all Americans under 65<\/a>\u00a0could be denied coverage without the ACA protections.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>America\u2019s\u00a0experience with state high-risk pools has been almost universally grim. Before the ACA\u2019s enactment, 35 states had such arrangements. They were chronically underfunded and for enrollees they were expensive, with deductibles as high as $10,000 and premiums as high as double those for healthy individuals. Every state\u00a0excluded coverage for as long as a year for the very conditions that made their users uninsurable on the open market. They typically imposed benefit limits too low to pay for treatment, time limits for enrollees, and waiting lists.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>For these reasons and others, by 2000 the pools were covering only 8% of the uninsurable population, according to <a href=\"http:\/\/theincidentaleconomist.com\/wordpress\/high-risk-pools-and-health-reform\/\" target=\"_blank\">a survey by health economist Austin Frakt<\/a>. (That may be where Ryan got his figure, but if so he made a glaring error.) Economist Harold Pollack calculated in 2010 that if a nationwide pool covered only 4 million people with a history of emphysema, stroke, cancer or a heart condition, it would cost <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3024120\/\" target=\"_blank\">more than $24 billion a year<\/a> and would still need to impose waiting periods before coverage of a condition and other restrictions. Whether a Republican Congress fixated on budget-cutting would appropriate that kind of money is doubtful.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>As for the success stories Ryan touted, he\u2019s overstating the case. <a href=\"http:\/\/archive.jsonline.com\/business\/new-health-care-law-spells-end-to-states-high-risk-insurance-program-b9986769z1-221958321.html\" target=\"_blank\">Wisconsin\u2019s pool<\/a> did better than most, with\u00a023,000 enrollees in\u00a02013, but imposed deductibles of at least $5,000, premiums of twice the standard rate, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.commonwealthfund.org\/usr_doc\/achman_uninsurable_472.pdf?section=4039\" target=\"_blank\">a six-month waiting period<\/a> for coverage of a preexisting condition.\u00a0 Utah Gov. <a id=\"PEPLT00007700\" title=\"Gary Herbert\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/topic\/politics-government\/government\/gary-herbert-PEPLT00007700-topic.html\">Gary Herbert<\/a> was already fretting about <a href=\"http:\/\/archive.sltrib.com\/story.php?ref=\/utah\/ci_14977394\" target=\"_blank\">the rising cost of his state\u2019s high-risk pool<\/a> in 2010, when the Affordable Care Act was enacted and took the problem off his hands.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s unclear what Ryan is referring to in his mention of Washington\u2019s high-risk pool. Like other states, Washington shut down its pool when the ACA\u2019s guarantee of coverage for anyone with a preexisting condition kicked in. It\u2019s still covering a few people who were enrolled before 2014, but that will end this Dec. 31. Before the ACA, the program was not popular. Premiums ran as high as $23,000 a year, and covered only about 30% of patients\u2019 expenses. The rest was borne by surcharges on commercial insurers, meaning that everyone with an individual or group policy in the state was paying for the pool \u2014 a reminder for Ryan that the cost of covering preexisting conditions can\u2019t be eliminated, only shifted around.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<strong>The \u201cdeath spiral.\u201d<\/strong> At the town hall, Ryan reiterated the specious claim that because more unhealthy people are buying Obamacare plans and \u201chealthy people [are] not buying it,\u201d rates are \u201cskyrocketing,\u201d driving more healthy people away and leaving costly unhealthy customers in the pool in a vicious cycle.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Experts who have examined the ACA market say nothing of the kind is happening. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/page\/files\/201701_individual_health_insurance_market_cea_issue_brief.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">The Council of Economic Advisers<\/a> reported this month that there\u2019s no evidence that premium increases have had an adverse effect on either enrollments in the individual market or the risk pool. Enrollment is rising, and signups of people in the 18-34 age range \u2014 the most desirable because most healthy category, have remained steady at about 28% of total enrollment. That\u2019s not as high as the 40% share that would be required to make the pool totally self-sustaining, but it\u2019s not declining either. And it contradicts Ryan\u2019s claim that \u201cyounger, healthier people [are] just going without insurance.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;<strong>What about replacement?<\/strong> Ryan was, typically, vague about what the Republican congressional majorities will propose to replace the ACA if it\u2019s repealed. He said he didn\u2019t want to get into \u201call of the legislative mumbo-jumbo,\u201d but of course the nature of the replacement isn\u2019t mumbo-jumbo to Obamacare beneficiaries \u2014 it\u2019s their life-and-death concern.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>One idea he did mention is expanding health savings accounts, which allow people to set aside tax exempt funds to pay for insurance. As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/business\/hiltzik\/la-fi-hiltzik-hsa-20161118-story.html\" target=\"_blank\">we\u2019ve mentioned before<\/a>, HSA\u2019s are giveaways to the rich and of limited use for lower-income people, who have trouble scraping together funds to put in an account and who won\u2019t get much benefit from a tax exemption.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The most important question that Ryan dodged on Thursday, and again <a href=\"http:\/\/www.speaker.gov\/press-release\/speaker-ryan-obamacare-repeal-resolution-critical-step-toward-delivering-relief\" target=\"_blank\">after Friday\u2019s House vote<\/a>, is what\u2019s the rush? Repealing almost any part of the ACA will leave the individual insurance market in worse shape than it is now, and possibly worse than it was before the ACA. That\u2019s especially true as long as no replacement plan is on the table. There are many routes to improving the Affordable Care Act without eroding public protections. If Ryan is truly intent on improving the lives of Americans dependent on the act, why does he have to shroud his intentions with misstatements and\u00a0misrepresentations?<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<!-- sktbuilder starter --><script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/plugins\/skt-builder\/sktbuilder\/sktbuilder-frontend-starter.js\"><\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/plugins\/skt-builder\/sktbuilder-wordpress-driver.js\"><\/script><script type=\"text\/javascript\"> var starter = new SktbuilderStarter({\"mode\": \"prod\", \"skip\":[\"jquery\",\"underscore\",\"backbone\"],\"sktbuilderUrl\": \"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/plugins\/skt-builder\/sktbuilder\/\", \"driver\": new SktbuilderWordpressDriver({\"ajaxUrl\": \"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-admin\/admin-ajax.php\", \"iframeUrl\": \"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/whats-the-hurry-to-destroy-obamacare\/?sktbuilder=true\", \"pageId\": 4970,  \"nonce\": \"c10bdfdd4c\", \"pages\": [{\"title\":\"NTD Officers\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/napervilledemocrats.org\\\/ntdo\\\/wp-admin\\\/post.php?post=475&action=sktbuilder\"},{\"title\":\"2022 Election\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/napervilledemocrats.org\\\/ntdo\\\/wp-admin\\\/post.php?post=11490&action=sktbuilder\"}], \"page\": \"What\\'s the Hurry to Destroy Obamacare?\" }) });<\/script><!-- end sktbuilder starter -->","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s worth reading through this short piece from the LA Times&#8217; Michael Hiltzik reviewing and shedding light on some of the many falsehoods the GOP is using to justify its<br \/><a class=\"moretag\" href=\"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/whats-the-hurry-to-destroy-obamacare\/\">+ Read More<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":4976,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[24,64,65,107,74],"class_list":["post-4970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-extremist-gop-2","tag-health-care","tag-obamacare","tag-obamacare-sabotage","tag-paul-ryan"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/mhiltzik-snap-photo.jpg?fit=750%2C422&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p2BzCg-1ia","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4970"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4970\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4978,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4970\/revisions\/4978"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4976"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/napervilledemocrats.org\/ntdo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}