Can We Get Help for the Unemployed Out Of the House?

In the course of a worthy rumination on how we might get some relief for Americans who still need unemployment assistance, Jonathan Chait gives us as clear an explanation as I’ve seen of how the GOPs pretense of deficit concern is used (Emphasis added):

a_560x375…To simply extend unemployment benefits would “add to the deficit in an irresponsible way,” complains Republican Senator Mark Kirk. Boehner has made similarly noncommittal noises.

This isn’t a genuine expression of concern for the size of the deficit. When Republicans actually care about a policy that adds to the deficit, they just pass it and put it on the credit card. That’s how they passed the immensely costly extension of the expiring Bush tax cuts. For that matter, that’s how they passed every deficit-increasing measure during the entire time they controlled the government under Bush – wars, tax cuts, drug benefits, energy subsidies, surges — they put them all on the tab. Demanding an offset is how you stop a policy you don’t care about without having to admit you don’t care about it.

Jonathan goes on to explain how we might extort some responsible behavior out of the GOP-controlled House (“the House, the pit of despair where even the most uncontroversial and sane legislation goes to die”).  Read his idea.  It might work.